The Third District Court of Appeal’s one-liners aren’t sitting well with some foreclosure defense attorneys who say it abuses per curiam affirmances, or PCAs, to avoid justifying rulings on lender standing.

From 2013 to the first week of March when the first large wave of appeals stemming from the housing collapse hit their dockets, the Third DCA wrote four opinions addressing lender standing, c-ompared with 76 opinions on the same subject from the Fourth DCA, according to a count by Davie attorney Michael Wrubel. During that period, the Fourth DCA wrote 63 appellate opinions that found the lender failed to prove standing. Of them, 44 reviewed trials and 19 involved summary judgments …